The heat and celtics?

some say that the heat played better than the celtics and the paul pierce scored only 1 point, so how in the heck did the heat still manage to lose the game? this game was more important to the heat than the celtics. the celtics have already proved that can beat real good teams. if the heat won, it shows they can compete with teams like the c's. heat beat la so i give them a lot of credit for that, but also lost twice to mavericks. if they can't beat the celtics during the regular season, there is little chance they are going to do so in the playoffs, the celtics are much more hungry because of that loss to la in game 07 of 2010. the only three good players on the heat are their big three. the rest of the bench is average or below. the celtics have a much better bench.